Under the doctrine of Strict Liability, which of the following is true?

Under the doctrine of Strict Liability, the key principle is that liability exists regardless of how safely the activity is conducted. This doctrine applies particularly to certain types of activities that are considered inherently dangerous or involve the use of hazardous materials, where the focus is on the nature of the activity itself rather than the conduct of the individuals involved.

In order to hold an individual or organization liable under strict liability, it is not necessary to prove that the party acted negligently or with intent to cause harm. Instead, the mere fact that the activity has caused damage or injury is sufficient for liability to be established. This is important in promoting safety and compensating victims, as it places the burden on the party engaging in the risky activity to take full responsibility for any resulting harm.

This position underscores a foundational aspect of strict liability in tort law, distinguishing it from negligence torts, where intent and the reasonableness of actions are evaluated.